[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":377},["ShallowReactive",2],{"services":3},[4,70,131,192,252,313],{"id":5,"slug":6,"title":7,"summary":8,"icon":9,"features":10,"order":15,"heading":16,"metaTitle":17,"metaDescription":18,"intro":19,"forWho":22,"deliverables":27,"process":40,"faqs":53,"proofSlugs":66},"svc-mvp","mvp-development","MVP Development","Go from idea to a product real users can pay for. We scope ruthlessly, build the core, and ship in weeks, not quarters.","rocket",[11,12,13,14],"Scope & feature triage","Clickable prototype","Production-ready build","Launch support",1,"MVP Development for Founders Who Need a Product, Not a Prototype","MVP Development Services","MVP development for startups and SMEs: ruthless scoping, a clickable prototype, then a production build real users can pay for. See the products we have launched.",[20,21],"A minimum viable product is not a cheap version of the real thing. It is the smallest build that can take a paying customer and teach you something true about the market. Most of the cost in a first version goes into features nobody asked for, so the discipline that matters is subtraction.","We scope against one question: what has to exist before someone can pay you? Everything else waits for evidence. That is what makes it possible to launch in weeks rather than quarters, and what stops version two becoming a rewrite of version one.",[23,24,25,26],"You have validated the idea in conversation and need something real to put in front of users","A prototype exists but cannot take a payment, a real account, or production traffic","You are raising, and a working product will do more than a deck","An internal spreadsheet or manual process has become the product, and it has stopped coping",[28,31,34,37],{"title":29,"text":30},"A Scope You Can Defend","Feature triage that separates what proves the business from what decorates it, written down so the trade-offs stay visible when deadlines press.",{"title":32,"text":33},"A Clickable Prototype","The core flows as something you can click through and show people, before a line of production code is committed to them.",{"title":35,"text":36},"A Production Build","Real authentication, real payments, real data, deployed to infrastructure you own. Not a demo with a login screen painted on.",{"title":38,"text":39},"Launch Support","We stay through release and the weeks after, when the things you could not have predicted surface.",[41,44,47,50],{"title":42,"text":43},"Scope and Triage","We take the idea apart and rebuild it as the shortest path to a paying user. You will hear the word no, with a reason attached.",{"title":45,"text":46},"Prototype","Core flows made clickable, so the expensive disagreements happen over a prototype rather than over finished code.",{"title":48,"text":49},"Build","A working demo every week. Fixed scope where scope can be fixed, and an honest conversation the moment something is not going to fit.",{"title":51,"text":52},"Launch and Learn","Ship to real users, instrument what matters, and decide the next increment from what they actually do.",[54,57,60,63],{"q":55,"a":56},"How small should an MVP actually be?","Small enough that one person can describe it in a sentence, and complete enough that a stranger can pay for it. If a feature does not serve that second test, it belongs in the next release.",{"q":58,"a":59},"Will we have to rebuild it later?","Not if it is built properly. Scoping tightly is about what you build, not how well. We use the same architecture and practice on a first version as on a funded product, which is what keeps version two an extension rather than a restart.",{"q":61,"a":62},"Who owns the code?","You do, throughout. The repository, the cloud accounts and the decisions are yours from the first commit. There is no lock-in and nothing is held hostage.",{"q":64,"a":65},"What if the idea turns out to be wrong?","That is the point of launching early, and it is a cheaper answer than a year of building. We would rather tell you the scope is wrong before we build it than after.",[67,68,69],"socialstudio","yourmellon","helpmyevent",{"id":71,"slug":72,"title":73,"summary":74,"icon":75,"features":76,"order":81,"heading":82,"metaTitle":83,"metaDescription":84,"intro":85,"forWho":88,"deliverables":93,"process":106,"faqs":118,"proofSlugs":128},"svc-web","web-design-development","Websites & Web Apps","Fast, accessible, search-optimised sites and web applications that make a small team look like a category leader.","layout",[77,78,79,80],"Brand-led design","Core Web Vitals budget","Technical SEO","CMS your team can drive",2,"Websites and Web Applications That Earn Their Place","Web Design & Development Services","Brand-led websites and web applications built fast, accessible and search-ready, with a CMS your team can actually drive. See the products we have shipped.",[86,87],"Most company websites are slow because nobody owned performance, invisible because nobody owned search, and stale because updating them requires a developer. All three are decisions, not accidents.","We build sites and web applications with a performance budget from the first commit, markup that search engines can read without executing JavaScript, and content your team can change without filing a ticket. The result is a small company that reads as a credible one.",[89,90,91,92],"Your current site looks nothing like the quality of the work you do","Everything is a developer ticket, so the content has not changed in a year","The site is slow on a phone and you have stopped looking at the numbers","You need a web application, not a brochure: accounts, dashboards, real workflows",[94,97,100,103],{"title":95,"text":96},"Brand-Led Design","A design that comes from your positioning rather than from a template, built as a system so later pages still look like they belong.",{"title":98,"text":99},"A Performance Budget","Core Web Vitals treated as a build constraint rather than an audit you fail afterwards. Fast on a mid-range phone, not just on your laptop.",{"title":101,"text":102},"Technical SEO In The Build","Server-rendered or prerendered HTML, correct canonicals, structured data, a real sitemap and share previews that render everywhere.",{"title":104,"text":105},"A CMS Your Team Can Drive","Editing that does not require a developer or a deploy, scoped so nobody can accidentally break the layout.",[107,110,113,115],{"title":108,"text":109},"Positioning and Structure","What the site has to do, for whom, and in what order. Information architecture before visual design, because the second is cheap to change and the first is not.",{"title":111,"text":112},"Design System","Components and tokens rather than page mockups, so the tenth page costs a fraction of the first.",{"title":48,"text":114},"Accessible markup, a performance budget enforced as you go, and the SEO groundwork done during the build rather than bolted on.",{"title":116,"text":117},"Launch and Hand Over","Deployed to infrastructure you own, with your team shown how to run it.",[119,122,125],{"q":120,"a":121},"Will it rank on Google?","The build gives you every technical advantage: crawlable HTML, correct canonicals, structured data, speed. Ranking also depends on content and on other sites linking to you, which no build can supply. We will tell you which part is which rather than promise rankings.",{"q":123,"a":124},"Can we edit it ourselves?","Yes. Content editing is scoped so your team can change copy, images and pages without a developer, and without being able to break the layout.",{"q":126,"a":127},"Do you work with our existing brand?","Usually, yes. If you have a brand that works we build to it. If the brand is the thing holding the site back, we will say so and show you why.",[129,69,130],"tradecontainers","conversional",{"id":132,"slug":133,"title":134,"summary":135,"icon":136,"features":137,"order":142,"heading":143,"metaTitle":144,"metaDescription":145,"intro":146,"forWho":149,"deliverables":154,"process":167,"faqs":180,"proofSlugs":190},"svc-saas","saas-platforms","SaaS Platforms","Multi-tenant products built to survive growth: billing, roles, analytics and an architecture that scales past launch.","layers",[138,139,140,141],"Multi-tenant architecture","Subscriptions & billing","Role-based access","Usage analytics",3,"SaaS Platforms Built to Survive Their Second Year","SaaS Platform Development","Multi-tenant SaaS development: tenant isolation, subscriptions and billing, role-based access and usage analytics, built to carry growth rather than postpone it.",[147,148],"The hard parts of a SaaS product are not the features customers talk about. They are tenant isolation, a billing model that survives contact with real pricing, permissions that hold when roles multiply, and knowing what usage actually looks like. Get those wrong early and every later feature is more expensive than the last.","We build those foundations first, because they are the ones you cannot retrofit cheaply. A platform that handles its hundredth customer the same way it handled its first is not an accident of scale; it is a set of decisions taken before launch.",[150,151,152,153],"You are turning a service, a spreadsheet or a one-off build into a product other companies pay for","Your current product cannot cleanly separate one customer from another","Pricing has changed and the billing code cannot follow it","Permissions started as admin and user, and reality has since produced six more roles",[155,158,161,164],{"title":156,"text":157},"Multi-Tenant Architecture","Isolation decided deliberately rather than inherited, so one customer can never see another and scale does not force a rewrite.",{"title":159,"text":160},"Subscriptions and Billing","Plans, tiers, trials, upgrades and the awkward cases: proration, failed payments, cancellations that have to stay compliant.",{"title":162,"text":163},"Role-Based Access","Permissions enforced in the domain layer rather than in the interface, so a new screen cannot accidentally hand out access.",{"title":165,"text":166},"Usage Analytics","Instrumentation that tells you which accounts are healthy, which are about to churn, and which features justify their maintenance.",[168,171,174,177],{"title":169,"text":170},"Domain and Tenancy Model","The decisions that are expensive to reverse: what a tenant is, where data lives, how isolation is enforced.",{"title":172,"text":173},"Core Platform","Accounts, roles, billing and the administrative surface your team will live in, built before the features that depend on them.",{"title":175,"text":176},"Product Features","The things customers actually buy, built on foundations that already hold.",{"title":178,"text":179},"Operate and Extend","Observability, cost control and a delivery rhythm that continues after launch.",[181,184,187],{"q":182,"a":183},"Shared database or one per tenant?","It depends on your compliance obligations, customer size and cost profile, and it is one of the few decisions that is genuinely expensive to reverse. We will walk you through the trade-off rather than default to whichever we used last.",{"q":185,"a":186},"Can you work with our existing SaaS product?","Yes. Taking on a platform that has outgrown its original design is a common starting point. We begin with an architecture review so you know what you are carrying before anyone commits to a plan.",{"q":188,"a":189},"Which payment provider do you use?","Whichever suits your market and compliance position. We have integrated card and bank transfer flows, regional methods such as iDEAL, and subscription billing with the proration and dunning cases handled.",[191,68,130],"chemovar",{"id":193,"slug":194,"title":195,"summary":196,"icon":197,"features":198,"order":203,"heading":204,"metaTitle":205,"metaDescription":206,"intro":207,"forWho":210,"deliverables":215,"process":228,"faqs":241,"proofSlugs":251},"svc-ai","ai-automation","AI & Intelligent Automation","Practical AI with a measurable payback: assistants, document pipelines and automations wired into the tools you already run.","brain",[199,200,201,202],"LLM applications & RAG","Workflow automation","Data pipelines","Evaluation & guardrails",4,"AI That Removes Work, Not AI That Sounds Impressive","AI & Automation Development","Applied AI with a measurable payback: assistants, retrieval over your own content, document pipelines and workflow automation, with evaluation and guardrails built in.",[208,209],"Most AI projects fail for the same reason: they start from the technology rather than from a task somebody is currently doing by hand. The useful version starts with a job that is repetitive, expensive and well defined, and asks whether a model can do it reliably enough to trust.","We build AI into products where it pays for itself, and we build the evaluation alongside it, because a feature that is right most of the time is only useful when you know which times those are.",[211,212,213,214],"A team is spending hours on work that is repetitive and rule-shaped","You have a corpus of documents nobody can search usefully","You want an assistant inside your product rather than a chatbot bolted to the side","An AI feature shipped, and nobody can tell whether it is actually working",[216,219,222,225],{"title":217,"text":218},"LLM Applications and Retrieval","Assistants grounded in your own content, so answers cite something real rather than being produced confidently from nothing.",{"title":220,"text":221},"Workflow Automation","The repetitive path between your existing tools automated end to end, with the human kept at the decisions that need one.",{"title":223,"text":224},"Data Pipelines","Getting your content into a shape a model can use: extraction, cleaning, chunking and keeping it current as the source changes.",{"title":226,"text":227},"Evaluation and Guardrails","Test sets, measured quality and explicit limits on what the system may do unsupervised. This is what separates a demo from something you can put in front of customers.",[229,232,235,238],{"title":230,"text":231},"Find the Task","We look for work that is repetitive, measurable and currently manual. If nothing qualifies, we will say so rather than invent a use case.",{"title":233,"text":234},"Prove It Small","A narrow version against real data, measured against a test set, before anything is wired into the product.",{"title":236,"text":237},"Build and Instrument","Production integration with evaluation, logging and guardrails from the start rather than added after the first bad output.",{"title":239,"text":240},"Tune Against Reality","Real usage reveals the cases a test set missed. The system improves against those rather than against assumptions.",[242,245,248],{"q":243,"a":244},"Will our data be used to train someone else's model?","Not if the integration is set up correctly. Which provider and which tier you use determines this, and it is a decision we make deliberately with you rather than by default.",{"q":246,"a":247},"How do you stop it making things up?","Grounding answers in retrieved source material, constraining what the system is allowed to do on its own, and measuring output against a test set so you can see quality rather than assume it. Nothing removes the failure mode entirely, which is why the guardrails matter.",{"q":249,"a":250},"Is AI actually right for our problem?","Often it is not, and a rule-based automation is cheaper, faster and more predictable. We will tell you when that is the case. A model is worth its cost when the task involves language or judgement, not when it involves arithmetic.",[67],{"id":253,"slug":254,"title":255,"summary":256,"icon":257,"features":258,"order":263,"heading":264,"metaTitle":265,"metaDescription":266,"intro":267,"forWho":270,"deliverables":275,"process":288,"faqs":301,"proofSlugs":311},"svc-mobile","mobile-applications","Mobile Applications","Native-feeling iOS and Android products, designed around the few moments that actually keep people coming back.","phone",[259,260,261,262],"iOS & Android","Offline-first sync","Push & lifecycle","Store release management",5,"Mobile Applications Built Around the Moments That Retain People","Mobile App Development","iOS and Android applications that feel native: offline-first sync, push and lifecycle messaging that is not noise, and store release management handled.",[268,269],"A mobile app lives or dies on a handful of moments: the first session, the notification that arrives at the right time, and whether it still works on a train with no signal. Feature count is rarely the problem.","We design around those moments first and build the rest in service of them, with offline behaviour treated as a requirement rather than an edge case.",[271,272,273,274],"Your product is used away from a desk, in transit, or somewhere with unreliable signal","A responsive website is being asked to do a job it is not suited to","You need push notifications that people do not immediately turn off","An app exists but retention falls off after the first week",[276,279,282,285],{"title":277,"text":278},"iOS and Android","Both platforms, built to feel native on each rather than identical on both.",{"title":280,"text":281},"Offline-First Sync","The app works without a connection and reconciles sensibly when one returns, including the conflicts that follow.",{"title":283,"text":284},"Push and Lifecycle","Messaging tied to what the user is actually doing, which is the difference between a notification that is opened and one that gets permissions revoked.",{"title":286,"text":287},"Store Release Management","Review guidelines, store listings, phased rollout and the submission cycle handled, so a release is not an event your team dreads.",[289,292,295,298],{"title":290,"text":291},"Find the Core Moments","The two or three interactions that define whether the app earns a place on a home screen.",{"title":293,"text":294},"Design for the Hand","Interaction designed for thumbs, interruption and small screens, not a desktop layout compressed.",{"title":296,"text":297},"Build With Offline Assumed","Sync and conflict resolution designed in from the start, because retrofitting offline behaviour is close to a rewrite.",{"title":299,"text":300},"Release and Iterate","Store submission, phased rollout, and the instrumentation to see what people actually do after install.",[302,305,308],{"q":303,"a":304},"Native or cross-platform?","It depends on how much the app leans on platform-specific capability and how fast you need both stores covered. Cross-platform is the right answer more often than it used to be, but not always, and we will show you the trade-off for your case.",{"q":306,"a":307},"Do we need an app at all?","Frequently not. If your users are at a desk and the job is occasional, a good web application is cheaper to build and far cheaper to maintain. We would rather tell you that early.",{"q":309,"a":310},"Who handles the store accounts?","They are yours. We will set them up and run the submission process, but the accounts, the certificates and the listings belong to you.",[312],"zuporta",{"id":314,"slug":315,"title":316,"summary":317,"icon":318,"features":319,"order":324,"heading":325,"metaTitle":326,"metaDescription":327,"intro":328,"forWho":331,"deliverables":337,"process":350,"faqs":363,"proofSlugs":376},"svc-scale","scale-and-support","Scale, Support & Optimisation","Inherit a codebase that is slowing you down? We stabilise it, pay down the risk, and keep shipping alongside your team.","infinity",[320,321,322,323],"Architecture review","Performance & cost tuning","CI\u002FCD and observability","Ongoing delivery squad",6,"For Products That Already Exist and Have Stopped Moving","Software Scaling, Support & Optimisation","Take on an existing codebase: architecture review, performance and cost tuning, CI\u002FCD and observability, and a delivery squad that ships alongside your team.",[329,330],"A product that has stopped moving is rarely one bad decision. It is usually an accumulation: a schema that no longer fits, a deploy nobody trusts, tests that were never written, and a bus factor of one. Every new feature pays interest on all of it.","We take on products in that state. The work starts with understanding what is actually there, then stabilising the parts that make change risky, then shipping again. Not a rewrite, which is almost always the more expensive answer and the one that stalls.",[332,333,334,335,336],"Shipping has slowed and nobody can fully explain why","The person who built it has left, or is about to","Deploys are manual, feared, or happen at night","Cloud spend has grown faster than usage and nobody knows which part","An agency or contractor handed something over and it has not been touched since",[338,341,344,347],{"title":339,"text":340},"Architecture Review","An honest account of what you have: what is sound, what is risk, what is costing you, and what to do in which order. Useful even if you stop there.",{"title":342,"text":343},"Performance and Cost Tuning","Finding where the time and the money actually go, which is usually not where the team assumes.",{"title":345,"text":346},"CI\u002FCD and Observability","Deploys that are boring and repeatable, and enough instrumentation to know something is wrong before a customer tells you.",{"title":348,"text":349},"An Ongoing Delivery Squad","Senior people shipping alongside your team at a steady rate, rather than a handover that creates another orphaned codebase.",[351,354,357,360],{"title":352,"text":353},"Review","We read the code, the infrastructure and the history, and write down what we find, including the parts that are fine.",{"title":355,"text":356},"Stabilise","The changes that make everything afterwards cheaper: a trustworthy deploy, the tests that cover the risky paths, the single points of failure removed.",{"title":358,"text":359},"Pay Down the Risk","Targeted work on the specific things blocking delivery, in the order that unblocks the most for the least.",{"title":361,"text":362},"Ship Again","Features resume, with the velocity that stabilising bought you.",[364,367,370,373],{"q":365,"a":366},"Should we just rewrite it?","Almost never. A rewrite means months with no new features while you reproduce behaviour nobody documented, and the second system usually inherits the first one's problems anyway. We will tell you if yours is the rare exception.",{"q":368,"a":369},"Can you work with our existing developers?","Yes, and it is usually the better arrangement. They hold context no review can reconstruct. We work alongside rather than replacing, and we document as we go so the knowledge stays with you.",{"q":371,"a":372},"What if the code is bad?","It usually is, in parts. Nobody is being judged. Most codebases that are slowing a company down were written under pressure by people doing their best with what they knew.",{"q":374,"a":375},"Can we start with just a review?","Yes, and it is often the sensible first step. You get a written assessment and a prioritised plan, and you are free to act on it with your own team.",[312,191,130],1791797600255]